3 ms·
Base64 is far from being efficient for this use case
by klntsky 3y ago
Base64 is far from being efficient for this use case
- pmarreck 3y agoBase122 or whatever the other option is (and I'm sure there are others), which tries to take advantage of the whole UTF-8 space, and probably wouldn't even work on URLs, is only something like 15% denser. Obviously, you're limited to printable characters, here.