3 ms·
This doesn't seem hard to understand at all to me. Someone getting hurt or killed by a machine in a factory likely wasn't following the proper and ideal safety
by SirMaster 3y ago
This doesn't seem hard to understand at all to me.
Someone getting hurt or killed by a machine in a factory likely wasn't following the proper and ideal safety protocols for one reason or another.
Lots of people are careless and don't care enough about safety rules in my experience. So it's not hard to end up with a lower number of total incidents when robot are put in charge.
But for some person who is not careless and who does follow safety protocols religiously, a robot causing them harm could be outside of their own control, even if they are following all the safety protocols and are always very careful.
Can you see how that could be a problem?
- elcritch 3y agoNo, a well designed safety protocol will integrate with the robot operation. Unless the safety protocol is flawed there should be no incidents with the robots. If the safety protocol is flawed it could happen with humans as well.
- SirMaster 3y agoI don't know how you can guarantee that. That a well designed safety protocol for am AI machine would never make a mistake that a given human wouldn't make. People are allowed to operate with their own additional steps of safety precautions which may be much more conservative than the steps assigned to an automated machine that they must now interact with. I'm talking about general personal safety protocols that a person could follow, that could be safer and more conservative than the protocols governing a more automatic machine. A machine being controlled by AI could have unpredictable behavior, I mean look at other areas of AI. Can we really predict what will always happen?