3 ms·
It's very easy to protect kids online - simply don't allow them online. Banning children from the internet violates fewer people's rights(the number of children
by kelseyfrog 3y ago
It's very easy to protect kids online - simply don't allow them online. Banning children from the internet violates fewer people's rights(the number of children) than violating everyone's right to privacy(the total population: adults + children).
The podcast makes a unsubstantiated and unexamined assumption: kids must be online. A cursory glance reveals that they in fact do not.
- nonrandomstring 3y ago> The podcast makes a unsubstantiated and unexamined assumption: kids > must be online. You haven't listened to a single word of it have you? https://soundcloud.com/chrismorrisbits/peter-ohanraha-hanrahans-911-at-the-world-trade-center-the-day-today https://soundcloud.com/chrismorrisbits/peter-ohanraha-hanrah... It says precisely the opposite.
- kelseyfrog 3y agoThe podcast starts with a kid interviewing parents who unanimously support the bill, calling it brilliant. If the podcast wants to say the thing, they should say the thing rather than its opposite.
- nonrandomstring 3y agoI'm sorry you felt tricked by that dramatic device. Perhaps listen to end of the podcast to get closure.
- mikestew 3y agoYa know, I actually upvoted your very-downvoted comment above, but if you’re going to hand out homework, make sure it’s not 1.25 hours long. If you have a point to make, make it; don’t outsource it to long-winded podcasters.
- nonrandomstring 3y agoThanks. And fair enough, it's a big ask to listen through the whole episode.
- jamiek88 3y agoInteresting critique considering the podcast says the exact opposite.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]