3 ms·
That's if they are not ambitious. Might also be trying to become the new Google, or at least put the O in MANFANGO.
by mustafa_pasi 3y ago
That's if they are not ambitious. Might also be trying to become the new Google, or at least put the O in MANFANGO.
- stavros 3y agoJesus, can we find a phrase like "tech giants", rather than changing the acronym according to the stock market?
- bob1029 3y agoI typically use "F100" or "F500" to refer to the space of all large corporations. This feels to me like a happy blend between explicit naming and including everyone with an LLC.
- stavros 3y agoI think the difference there is that FAANG+ refers explicitly to tech companies, rather than things like Exxon or whatnot.
- zoklet-enjoyer 3y agoReminds me of 2SLGBTQ+
- paulddraper 3y agoLol I did always wonder how Netflix qualified for FAANG but little ol' Microsoft didn't.
- anurag6892 3y agohigher comp at Netflix
- jedberg 3y agoFAANG was coined by Jim Cramer, a stock pundit. It was the five biggest tech earners that year. Microsoft was flat which is why it wasn't there, while Netflix was the single biggest gainer in the S&P500 that year. It has nothing to do with tech, salary, talent, or anything like it. It's purely based on stock growth in 2012/2013.
- paulddraper 3y ago> Microsoft was flat How the turn tables
- isanjay 3y agoFANMANGO. has mango