They want it to return a single token yes/no, which may not work so well since it doesn't have "space to think". Chain of thought is much more reliable. But th

They want it to return a single token yes/no, which may not work so well since it doesn't have "space to think". Chain of thought is much more reliable. But that costs more.. but they ended up anyway doing: >The other key will be 'reason' and include a free text explanation of why you chose Yes or No. But they did yes/no FIRST, then reason. So he ended up asking for the answer, and then asked it to _justify_ why that's the answer. For chain of thought to be helpful, you do the opposite: First explain why these addresses match or don't match, then give a final answer. Same amount of tokens but activated chain of thought prior to the answer, giving it "space to think".