3 ms·
Two generations of pinephone disagree. I think the price is due to labor costs for software.
by stonogo 3y ago
Two generations of pinephone disagree. I think the price is due to labor costs for software.
- asddubs 3y agopine also puts $0 into software though
- finitestateuni 3y agoAre you trying to contradict or agree with the post you replied to? That’s exactly what they are saying.
- asddubs 3y agoNeither, really, just spell out what that means more explicitly
- pengaru 3y agoI think pine64's business model is to pursue sales volume, but it's unclear to me if there's enough buyers of linux phones for that approach to be sustainable long-term. Maybe if they can keep refreshing their model with regular hardware upgrades, they can milk their base. Having a pine64 style competitor is problematic for Purism since it's cannibalizing their sales. It's likely contributing to the even higher prices needed just to keep the lights on. Which just creates more pressure diverting potential sales towards pine64. Would Purism even move more product if their prices better matched pine64's? Is there a queue of would-be librem5 buyers waiting that just can't stomach the price? How many people are there really who want a chunky phone with work-in-progress software, regardless of price? My prediction is after Purism implodes Pine64's prices start climbing.
- seba_dos1 3y ago> I think the price is due to labor costs for software. Mostly, but not only. There's also user support, and PinePhones are much cheaper to build.