4 ms·

iPhones are also banned in Russia for govt officials. I believe that was after Kaspersky reported on the targeted vuln/backdoor attack ("Operation Triangulation

• manuelabeledo 3y ago
  > I believe that was after Kaspersky reported on the targeted vuln/backdoor attack If that is true, what a bizarre reaction. Apple wasn't behind this, and, if anything, it highlighted Kaspersky shortcomings.
  • cabirum 3y ago
    Kaspersky exposed apple devices are backdoored and cannot be trusted. These devices are essentially black boxes controlled by adversary that cannot be properly audited. Apple obviously cooperates with Western govts providing/injecting backdoors, so it's prudent to ban them. What "kaspersky shortcomings" are you talking about?
    • manuelabeledo 3y ago
      > Kaspersky exposed apple devices are backdoored and cannot be trusted. iPhones are of course not invulnerable to malware, no one is claiming that. Android devices aren't either. What Kaspersky "exposed" was that their corporate devices were compromised. They claimed victory afterwards when they found the fact. But the truth is that they inadvertently allowed malware to roam free in their corporate devices for several years, which is quite telling, especially for a security company. Them shifting the blame to Apple is like blaming Cisco for a corporate network hack, when your personnel left a device exposed to the internet with no appropriate protections in place. Yeah, a Meraki could be as much of a "black box" as a mobile device. I get that Kaspersky has no business with Apple, but the whole saga was bizarrely unprofessional from their part.