3 ms·
Better? Wrong. Please read "Minimize HTTP Requests" here: http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html
by gokhan 15y ago
Better? Wrong. Please read "Minimize HTTP Requests" here:
http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html http://developer.yahoo.com/performance/rules.html
- wisty 15y agoIf you use domain sharding you can get more parellel downloads on older browsers which reduces the problems some due to more requests (parellel request limit on old browsers and unneeded cookies for static resources, but theres still overhead), but that's a separate issue. It's best to avoid the problem altogether by minimizing HTTP Requests (as you suggest).
- huxley 15y agoThat's a great rule for general purposes, but it's intended for situations where you have lots of small assets that you are asking the client to download. In this instance we're talking about 2 megapixel images, so the extra HTTP requests are not even going to register in the mix. With modern browsers pulling down 6+ parallel downloads, breaking the image up might make plenty of sense.
- rorrr 15y agoIt's not wrong. If you have only a few slices, they will load in parallel in most browsers.