3 ms·
It makes sense. Falcon 40B was trained on around 1 trillion tokens. If it was trained to saturation, then Falcon 180B would need to be trained on 180/40=4.5 tri
by logicchains 3y ago
It makes sense. Falcon 40B was trained on around 1 trillion tokens. If it was trained to saturation, then Falcon 180B would need to be trained on 180/40=4.5 trillion tokens to saturate it, but it was only trained on 3.5 trillion. And if 1 trillion wasn't enough to saturate the 40B model, then 3.5 trillion definitely won't be enough to saturate the 180B model. If not trained to saturation, then a model can be quantised without losing too much, as it still has "empty space" that can be removed by compression, so to speak.