2 ms·
There is not a “decent amount of confidence” and your CNN link provides no proof that there’s any at all outside of a sentence claiming tree rings and coral mea
by edgyquant 3y ago
There is not a “decent amount of confidence” and your CNN link provides no proof that there’s any at all outside of a sentence claiming tree rings and coral mean it may be. There is so much disinformation (from both sides) and fear mongering about this subject that anything not a direct and peer reviewed source should not be taken as any kind of proof of anything.
- SketchySeaBeast 3y agoTo portray this as a "both sides" problem is to wildly misunderstand the scientific discourse, or mistake it for the political one.
- mrguyorama 3y agoThe american right desperately want this to be a political fight so they can continue to ignore and profit from it for another few decades while they all die off and not have to worry about the consequences
- edgyquant 3y agoNice projection, you’re just spitting word for word political nonsense which is unrelated to a single thing I said. CNN saying that there is proof this is the hottest day in 120,000 years isn’t scientific and linking to them doing so isn’t an act of engaging in science. I think maybe it’s you who has gotten so caught up in a political fight you’re convinced you aren’t taking part it one.
- edgyquant 3y agoI just said that a vague CNN article isn’t scientific proof of anything. Who’s mixing up science and politics again?