3 ms·
Unsure why this is controversial. It's pretty common practice to start full manual and then automate pieces of the process as you go with a human-in-the-loop,
by nickpinkston 3y ago
Unsure why this is controversial.
It's pretty common practice to start full manual and then automate pieces of the process as you go with a human-in-the-loop, often with edge cases still being full manual forever as the cost of labor < cost to engineer out of all edge cases.
- Cenk 3y agoIt’s controversial because it’s fundamentally dishonest
- lancesells 3y agoBecause it's lying to your customers, to your investors, to the press, etc.
- nickpinkston 3y agoI'm unsure if they're claiming "It's 100% automated now" vs "Our goal is 100% automated". If it's the former, then yea that's dishonest, but the point is whether it's scalable now / likely possible eventually. I could imagine that being the case.