7 ms·
No - it's Duplo and designed to be abused. It's not going to suddenly explode into shards of plastic in the middle of the night. Probably need to define "too m
by goldcd 3y ago
No - it's Duplo and designed to be abused.
It's not going to suddenly explode into shards of plastic in the middle of the night.
Probably need to define "too much tension". Is a bit of tension that enables you to build the thing you want and couldn't otherwise, a good or a bad thing?
(e.g. maybe I want a spiral)
I'd have thought if overly tensioned, once tolerances were overcome, the track would develop a camber.
Maybe build on a perfectly flat, frictionless surface and then if your track isn't perfectly level you know there's tension.
- mhb 3y agoIt's a math problem. Read TFA.
- Retric 3y agoIt’s an engineering program masquerading as a math problem. Long enough racks can have misalignment without noticeable issues because each segment has some play.
- notatoad 3y agoengineering takes into account material properties. the engineering solution is "no, that tension is way inside the design tolerances" the stack overflow answers are math.
- Retric 3y agoThe top rated answer was math, but it ignored the possibility that a section of track would be under tension to avoid intersecting with itself. For a mathematical curve that’s no issue, but physical objects add additional constraints to the problem.
- mhb 3y agoNo. It's the other way around. If someone did FEA on the track and showed you a stress map, it would be obvious how uninteresting framing it as an engineering problem is.
- Retric 3y agoThe question opens with a question about the material properties of a physical object and many of the replies address that. As a pure math problem it’s got a few constraints such as the track not physically intersecting with itself which go beyond the stated question. So yes it’s a toy problem, but one constrained by real world objects.
- hgsgm 3y agoIt's a real world problem, but one constrained by toy objects.
- mhb 3y agoYeah, that's human interest to get you interested in the problem and how it occurred to the author. Do you think the trolley problem is about trolley cars on rails with switches?
- Retric 3y agoThe most upvoted response was objectively wrong due to real world constraints. The real world is irrelevant in the trolly problem or the 4 color theorem etc. You may personally be interested in it as a purely mathematical problem, but he’s looking for a real world answer so poor abstractions are useless. On the other hand “I would first check for track flatness. When locked in with extra effort, the loop will warp a little, basically going into 3d instead of flat 2d.” is a useful shortcut.
- mhb 3y ago> he’s looking for a real world answer Based on his history in StackExchange, it is unlikely Lezzup is looking for a real world answer. The top tags of his posts are: mathematics, sudoku, geometry, logical-deduction, sequence, and enigmatic-puzzle. https://puzzling.stackexchange.com/users/84683/lezzup https://puzzling.stackexchange.com/users/84683/lezzup
- 3y ago
- goldcd 3y agoand I quote "I am sure this could be calculated mathematically, but I prefer a more quick, practical way."
- slingnow 3y ago"Too much tension" is not a math problem. It's an engineering problem (and a poorly defined one, at that). Try thinking for a few seconds before posting such a meritless dismissal.
- mhb 3y agogoldcd> It's not going to suddenly explode into shards of plastic in the middle of the night. That gives you the impression that goldcd fully comprehended the scope of the inquiry?
- acyou 3y agoTFA: "I am sure this could be solved mathematically, but I prefer something quick and practical."
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]