3 ms·
It's important to note that prior versions of Falcon were released under Apache 2.0 and that Falcon 180B is released under a more restrictive license.
by dmezzetti 3y ago
It's important to note that prior versions of Falcon were released under Apache 2.0 and that Falcon 180B is released under a more restrictive license.
- hedora 3y agoIt's also important to note that the copyright-ability of these models is controversial, and has not been tested in court. Anyway, this clause is particularly bad: > You should monitor the web address at which the Acceptable Use Policy is hosted to ensure that your use of the Work or any Derivative Work complies with the updated Acceptable Use Policy. So, I guess they can just change the AUP and then you have to discontinue use of previously generated stuff. I wonder if that's enforceable in court. Imagine if the Word EULA contained a clause like this, and then later Microsoft used the clause to force a publisher to destroy all copies of a book they didn't like.
- regularfry 3y agoThere's no way that's enforceable. Any contract requires a meeting of minds, and a change of contract requires agreement of all parties. They can't unilaterally change the terms after the fact without agreement, you can't agree to something if you don't know about it, and "should" isn't "must as a condition of use". Not only that, but I don't think they can stop you from using the model under the original terms if they change them and you do know but don't agree. At least, if you have it downloaded and are running it for yourself.
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]