3 ms·
I’m no expert on LLMs, but I don’t find this super surprising from a general ML point of view: You have a generative model with billions of parameters that alr
by bjornsing 3y ago
I’m no expert on LLMs, but I don’t find this super surprising from a general ML point of view:
You have a generative model with billions of parameters that already assigns some probability mass to your (fine-tuning) samples. Now you compute a gradient that increases that probability mass, and take a step in the gradient’s direction. Essentially the OP is surprised that this significantly increases the probability mass of the samples under the model.
I’m not very surprised. The generative model is enormously over-parameterized and already assigns some probability mass to the (fine-tuning) samples. It would be surprising to me if there wasn’t a direction in this billion-dimensional parameter space that rapidly increases the probability of the relatively few samples.
- danielmarkbruce 3y agoI had the same thought. This was very unsurprising. I couldn't tell if that made me the idiot here.