It seems like i'm mixing them, but i'm not. I'm saying as a matter of fact ChatGPT should have different confidences in propositions. My issue isnt the tone of

It seems like i'm mixing them, but i'm not. I'm saying as a matter of fact ChatGPT should have different confidences in propositions. My issue isnt the tone of voice, my issue is the content of what it's saying is wrong wrt what we care about, ie., expert credences (/confidences) in the claims it's generating. It can "express confidently" scepticism; it does not. That's the issue. In my lang above i was mostly using credence to talk about the strength of the mental state of belief; and confidence to talk about the model of that used in statistical AI.