I mean, all the attestation here does is say this photo came from this person / camera. Like a hardware-backed NFT. The trust ultimately lies with the photograp

I mean, all the attestation here does is say this photo came from this person / camera. Like a hardware-backed NFT. The trust ultimately lies with the photographer and, by extension, the org they're working for at the time. I'm not sure how different this is from Reuters just publishing the photo and archiving the link on wayback. Any future versions can choose to use that link as provenance, an eyeball is all that's needed. Complex technobabble won't stop screams of "fake news."