3 ms·
Do those statutes apply for interoperability? Which takes precedence? This is basically how Rockstar used it - to make the game work on computers without CDs.
by hnick 3y ago
Do those statutes apply for interoperability? Which takes precedence?
This is basically how Rockstar used it - to make the game work on computers without CDs. So the actual rights holder has recognised that this tool or one like it is legitimately required for interoperability, between the game as a piece of technology and a modern computer. They won't work together otherwise.
Maybe I am being too tricky but that's how I see it. And if that makes it a legitimate work then it's funny to think about the consequences.
- ArnoVW 3y agoCertain excemptions are provided in the DMCA, and have been established via jurisprudenence: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/10/28/2021-23311/exemption-to-prohibition-on-circumvention-of-copyright-protection-systems-for-access-control https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2021/10/28/2021-23... Geeks often think that the law is some sort of blockchain-esque thing that is absolute, context-free and machine-interpretable. In reality, many laws require 'guilty intent' (mens rea). This is why we have 'judges', who perform 'judgement'. So the same tool called 'no-cd', marketed as a backup tool may be judged 'OK', where 'WaR3z HaCk.exe' published by a group of known software pirates will be judged 'anti circumvention'