4 ms·
I can imagine the argument when X is something that only negative affects the 'defector' (eg: "everyone should wear a helmet but the government shouldnt make yo
by esrauch 3y ago
I can imagine the argument when X is something that only negative affects the 'defector' (eg: "everyone should wear a helmet but the government shouldnt make you wear a motorcycle helmet") but what's the rationale when the reason that everyone should do X the social good at no costs, rather than personal good?
- Sophistifunk 3y agoBecause all government power is itself intrinsically a huge cost to society. We don't serve them, they serve us.
- adgjlsfhk1 3y agoensuring compliance has a non-zero cost. you need to set up a regulations, have people to enforce them and deal with the aftermath of the enforcement (this last one is why the war on drugs was so dumb).