3 ms·
I think you're confusing X/Y and faith here. You're making the basic assumption that the comment itself is in bad faith because it's not formulated the way you
by Conan_Kudo 3y ago
I think you're confusing X/Y and faith here. You're making the basic assumption that the comment itself is in bad faith because it's not formulated the way you expect. That doesn't stand up to scrutiny because everyone evaluates and expresses things differently, and many folks would consider that a bad faith evaluation of feedback (whether it is positive or negative in reality wouldn't matter).
I think there's a stronger argument of an X/Y problem in the statement, since they talk about what they see as output vs what they expect to see instead.
And frankly, I am disappointed too, as these people working on this project should have spent all that time understanding how Hashicorp actually handled the codebase and ensured that their own engineers followed the same quality level for development. They're all definitely capable of it, so they should actually do it.
Otherwise it's going to be hard to trust the fork to succeed.
- sanderjd 3y agoThere's nothing more I can say on the bad-faithness thing that I didn't already say in my last comment. I think the comment speaks for itself, and I don't agree that it is "X/Y", or itself a bad faith evaluation. (I do think you may be missing that I was responding to the entire sequence of comments, which started with just a drive-by swipe at pull request merging process, not just the later comments expressing disappointment with the perceived emphasis on marketing over engineering.) I think your direct expression of disappointment is totally reasonable. I personally think it's also super premature to be disappointed, but it's your prerogative. But I just think the other commenter's approach to expressing this criticism was way off base.