3 ms·
This won’t be productive. You’re making a strawman argument. I said there are other circumstances where civil liberties were restricted and war was a common on
by alphabettsy 3y ago
This won’t be productive. You’re making a strawman argument.
I said there are other circumstances where civil liberties were restricted and war was a common one, not that they were justified or anything else you’ve said. Civil liberties have been restricted in past pandemics as well.
I’m not going to debate the rest of what you said because it’s a response to an argument that I didn’t make, but it’s largely wrong.
- anon291 3y ago> Civil liberties have been restricted in past pandemics as well. Not universally throughout the country, no. There has been none. I can't take seriously anyone who claims the COVID response was anything other than unprecedented
- jfax 3y agohttps://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-pandemic-isnt-a-black-swan-but-a-portent-of-a-more-fragile-global-system https://www.newyorker.com/news/daily-comment/the-pandemic-is...
- anon291 3y agoThere is nothing unprecedented about COVID. It is not the deadliest pandemic by any account. We simply had different attitudes toward civil liberties and the role of government in the past. The Spanish flu saw minimal national level policy and isolated (time and space) restrictions in particular places, along with sensible policies (like outdoor classrooms) meant to ameliorate the worst aspects. The sort of coercion during COVID was unprecedented. It is not something that we should accept.
- dralley 3y ago"The United States lost 675,000 people to the Spanish flu in 1918-more casualties than World War I, World War II, the Korean War and the Vietnam War combined." 0.5% of the US population died due to the Spanish Flu. Look, I understand where you're coming from, but I don't know that you would actually prefer 1918 policies if the same scenario were to be replayed in the present day.