3 ms·
Right. Presumably in that scenario both economists thought it to be at least $100 worth of entertainment to watch the other eat shit, while both also thought $1
by ascorbic 3y ago
Right. Presumably in that scenario both economists thought it to be at least $100 worth of entertainment to watch the other eat shit, while both also thought $100 was enough compensation to eat it. Everyone is better off.
- epylar 3y agoJust because you think you're better off doesn't mean you're better off though.
- simmerup 3y agoWhy not? What we think is pretty much all that matters
- fatfingerd 3y agoPerhaps cumulatively, but in a particular moment? A infectious disease specialist may further raise GDP in this story, moments or years later.