3 ms·
What's interesting is that her suit doesn't seem to counter the accusation of fraudulent data in her research, but rather that they can't prove it was her that
by tristor 3y ago
What's interesting is that her suit doesn't seem to counter the accusation of fraudulent data in her research, but rather that they can't prove it was her that actually did it. She seems to be expecting a former lab manager that worked for her to take the fall, even though she was the lead named author of the research.
- fatfingerd 3y agoI don't really know that her case against Harvard is that unreasonable. It's not like Harvard has never been caught prioritizing shielding its community over academic integrity, so why not this time? But the leap to going after the independent researchers is just bizarre. Do we have an obligation to stop if an institution suddenly prioritizes integrity and we don't know why?