3 ms·
>No-where does it mention meat It's literally called "meat and cheese co". You have to look above the branded and bold FIELD ROAST to see that it's a "plant b
by treis 3y ago
>No-where does it mention meat
It's literally called "meat and cheese co". You have to look above the branded and bold FIELD ROAST to see that it's a "plant based meat and cheese co".
You've gone from:
>Vegan products enjoy a healthy markup, and vegan stuff sells nicely. No producer is relegating the fact that their product is vegan to some fine print
To quibbling about whether clearly secondary text counts as "fine print". It's not an honest argument. To further illustrate, I never said "fine print". I said "small text". You're trying to shift my goal posts in order to find some fig leaf to be right.
- danielbln 3y agoI'm not quibbling, and disagree with the notion that I'm doing dishonest discourse. I merely disagree with you that the package as you have linked it is deceptive, and that it is in my opinion not in need of further regulation. What does an appropriate packaging for a plant based sausage look like to you?
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- treis 3y ago>disagree with the notion that I'm doing dishonest discourse. I merely disagree with you that the package as you have linked it is deceptive Nah, the chain was: Me: They mimick meat products as closely as they can and relegate the vegetarian part to the small text You: Vegan products enjoy a healthy markup, and vegan stuff sells nicely. No producer is relegating the fact that their product is vegan to some fine print in the hopes to trick someone trying to buy animal meat Anyone engaging in honest debate would look at the package I linked and see that it doesn't look like anything you describe. They also wouldn't say "No-where does it mention meat" and then completely ignore the fact that "meat and cheese co" is on the package when pointed out.