Awaiting the substack post that: - Can't reproduce the issue that this paywalled article links to - Finds that the methodology used to assess "accuracy" isn't

Awaiting the substack post that: - Can't reproduce the issue that this paywalled article links to - Finds that the methodology used to assess "accuracy" isn't actually checking accuracy, but is checking for a specific output, and that output generally does still produce the right value, just in a different format - Summarizes by saying that ChatGPT is neither the second coming of christ nor horribly inaccurate, just something in between