> This is an overly narrow and ungenerous interpretation of the criticism here. What? No it's not. It seems to me you completely misunderstand WASM by saying "

> This is an overly narrow and ungenerous interpretation of the criticism here. What? No it's not. It seems to me you completely misunderstand WASM by saying "the anatomy of the page is as manipulable as it's ever been through standardized interfaces (DOM)" as that's clearly unchanged with WASM! WASM doesn't even have access to the DOM yet, so literally WASM uses the same JS code browser extensions do.