3 ms·
AI taking to AI to do things is not necessarily an exercise in futility. This paper used 3.5, not even 4 and is basically a couple AI agents collaborating to c
by famouswaffles 3y ago
AI taking to AI to do things is not necessarily an exercise in futility.
This paper used 3.5, not even 4 and is basically a couple AI agents collaborating to create software.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924 https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.07924
This is another example at multi AI agent collaboration.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02485 https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.02485
Getting relevant intelligent text to arbitrary previous text means generating text capable of making decisions. That is the end game here. Your machine can think for you now.
- stephendause 3y agoThat's a good point. Still, I think that's different from an AI agent attending a meeting "for you" as a surrogate. If I were in a meeting where someone sent their personal AI assistant instead of attending, I would be insulted. I'd much rather someone send me a note explaining why they can't be there and letting me know anything they want from those of us in the meeting.
- famouswaffles 3y agoWell if I have it correctly right now for duet, the personal AI assistant act is only on the receiving end of the person missing the meeting. You can talk to the AI about the meeting but the AI won't talk to the attendees (only share generated notes)
- sdeframond 3y agoThis reminds me of the book priced at $23,698,655.93 (plus $3.99 shipping) by algorithms. https://www.wired.com/2011/04/amazon-flies-24-million/ https://www.wired.com/2011/04/amazon-flies-24-million/