> I fail to see how pointing the finger at chromebooks specifically is more than a distraction. They have a built-in kill switch. After pre-set number of year

> I fail to see how pointing the finger at chromebooks specifically is more than a distraction. They have a built-in kill switch. After pre-set number of years (from launch and not from purchase) they become useless to schools. Macs and PCs only die when they die, not when they hit their cut-off date. At that point the other devices have resale values and 'expired' Chromebooks don't. > There is a bigger problem at play here, a massive culture of consumption. Then pointing the finger at Chromebooks is extremely relevant, as enforced lifetime limits lead to (relatively) rapidly replaced devices with no future beyond landfill and more consumption.