2 ms·
This has always followed protectionism, I'd guess. Really the solution would have been to socialize the domestic losses caused by globalization (retraining work
by Apocryphon 3y ago
This has always followed protectionism, I'd guess. Really the solution would have been to socialize the domestic losses caused by globalization (retraining workers, etc.), but there seems to be no interest or political will towards doing that.
- verve_rat 3y agoThe problem is that for a lot of places, globalisation seems to mean, paying money to US companies and harming the local tax base. If the money is shipped overseas, how to you pay for the socialised losses?