I really love this kind of thinking and explanation - it may not be correct per se, but it's the TYPE of thinking we need. Rather than fluffy repetitions of th

I really love this kind of thinking and explanation - it may not be correct per se, but it's the TYPE of thinking we need. Rather than fluffy repetitions of the slogans of in-groups, it's an attempt to explore long term impacts using fundamental scientific principles, none of which are individually too complex. And if we don't agree with the 2% annual energy growth rate for 1000 years then that's fine, we can fiddle the numbers for what we believe, and the same analysis can be valuable even if it ends up supporting a different conclusion. I'm interested by the language style as well, it reads like they put it through a filter to generate "simple English" as a deliberate choice.