3 ms·
A key argument appears to be based on incorrect data. Specifically, as I write this, the OP states that the number of housing units per capita in the US is at
by cs702 3y ago
A key argument appears to be based on incorrect data.
Specifically, as I write this, the OP states that the number of housing units per capita in the US is at an all-time high, per this plot (unless the OP changes it):
https://www.oftwominds.com/photos2023/housing-per-capita8-23a.png https://www.oftwominds.com/photos2023/housing-per-capita8-23...
Federal data shows otherwise. Here's the actual number of housing units divided by number of persons in the US:
https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=18r64 https://fred.stlouisfed.org/graph/?g=18r64
Otherwise, I'm reluctant to call the US housing market a "bubble," because I haven't seen the classic signs of financial mania.
- oofta-boofta 3y ago[dead]
- Jeslijar 3y agoYour fed link says it is an estimate. I don't know where this guy gets data but I don't think the availability is that far off from the peak. https://twitter.com/Econimica/status/1698596620022186428 https://twitter.com/Econimica/status/1698596620022186428 You're talking less than 2 percentage points with the fed estimate anyway right?