> So, taking that as the reason for wielding a two-handed backhand That's your mistake. Here's another quote from the article: "The two-handed backhand is far

> So, taking that as the reason for wielding a two-handed backhand That's your mistake. Here's another quote from the article: "The two-handed backhand is far more stable, he said, and the motion is shorter and simpler." There are a number of good reasons for amateur players to use a two-handed backhand, and that's indeed why countless amateur players do use a two-handed backhand. Are you seriously claiming that they're all wrong, and also all of the tennis instructors who teach them are wrong too? It's really quite simple: many players, amateur and pro, hit the ball better and play better with a two-hander than with a one-hander. So why wouldn't you use a stroke that makes you play better? > "Ignorance" can only be applied to intellectual matters, not to a backhand Disagreed. There are difference kinds of knowledge, e.g., knowledge-that and knowledge-how. > "Solipsistic" means that I believe a world view in which only my consciousness is real. Check the dictionary. It also means "very self-centered", for example.