5 ms·
I personally think it was likely/almost certainly the case. That doesn’t change the fact that without sufficient actual evidence it remains “allegedly.”
by ComputerGuru 3y ago
I personally think it was likely/almost certainly the case. That doesn’t change the fact that without sufficient actual evidence it remains “allegedly.”
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- zozbot234 3y agoWell, the announcement talks about clear-cut ToS violations. Maybe it was about illegally streamed soccer matches - that's a bit of a plague as of late.
- lnxg33k1 3y agoPiracy is still the best way/our best chance to get rid of soccer and all the nothingness that it involves in terms of drama, gossip, etc
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]
- Vinnl 3y agoI mean, it could also be beheadings, revenge porn, doxxing, etc. Lots of clear-cut violations that are more serious than illegally streamed soccer matches. But the true answer is probably "all of the above".
- pengaru 3y agoNot all porn is CSAM... Are we just assuming it's CSAM because non-CSAM would be on OnlyFans? Is there not an appeal for the anonymity and zero-cost Jitsi offered vs. OF-like services, for consenting adults? I've never used OF but assumed they take a cut. Through Jitsi a performer could arrange for payment via crypto, protect their identity, and not pay a cut to any middle-men beyond the crypto fees. What am I missing?