4 ms·
You do realize that the US is also down from its' peak of CO2/Capita production, whereas china is getting there per-captia. (13 US, ~9 China), and the trend doe
by slackfan 3y ago
You do realize that the US is also down from its' peak of CO2/Capita production, whereas china is getting there per-captia. (13 US, ~9 China), and the trend doesn't seem to be stopping? Per capita becomes kind of a bad comparitor when the trend is towards parity, and the overall output isn't slowing.
I've been around long enough to see that the climate change stuff really only ratchets up in the US when going into an election year, and if the correct candidate makes it in, it immediately stops, regardless of their actual climate change policy. (Sure, let's ignore the drilling that's going on under the current administration. Or the oil permits being given out. Or the lessenings of tarrifs on import goods leading to an increase of fantastic microplastics in your drinking water and additional CO2 emissions overseas). There really is no room to not be harsh on articles like this. The only thing articles like this are doing is proving the denlialists right.
(Grabbing my data from https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?locations=CN https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/EN.ATM.CO2E.PC?location... here)
- myrmidon 3y agoIt's great that the US emissions are improving, but I'm very sceptical about them reaching Chinese levels even within a decade, and arguing for improvements elsewhere while doing really badly appears very hypocritical to me (expecially with the cumulative emissions in mind when talking about nations like India). I believe the main problem with climate change policy in the west is simply that voters in general don't really want to sacrifice anything for climate change mitigations, and without significant sacrifices government is very limited in what can be achieved...