2 ms·
It's not high art, I'll concede that point, but it has some value in its unaltered state. There's been countless times I was looking for something only to have
by mopenstein 3y ago
It's not high art, I'll concede that point, but it has some value in its unaltered state. There's been countless times I was looking for something only to have my hopes dashed because it was being made available from this channel alone. I'll also concede I'm not the average consumer of entertainment. But if this stuff isn't for people like me, then who? If no one cares, why produce it all? If all it does is frustrate the people that do care, why produce it all?
Watermarks have their place, if you're the original creator, but to take works from others and slap your ad on it is pretty despicable (relatively).
- saurik 3y agoSure: I am not defending that they added the watermark, and agree that that sucks (and would even accept "despicable" as a good adjective to describe it)... I am merely defending that, if the only copy I have access to has a watermark, it has effectively zero impact on any use case I can fathom for the video.