it seems like this person's issue with 2FA is that Github's rationale is to protect the software supply chain, which is consumed by millions including large cor

it seems like this person's issue with 2FA is that Github's rationale is to protect the software supply chain, which is consumed by millions including large corporations. The writer is offended by the notion of being asked to do something that might be helpful towards the community that includes corporate consumers: > Independent FOSS developers do not owe anything to companies, including the slightest effort to "secure the software supply chain" for "consumers." As the licenses say, THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND … Right, the warranty has no protection against "the software also may be compromised by third parties and contain all kind of backdoors and exploits, which is also not my problem" I'm sure Github is sad to see such contributors leave !