No doubt double checking is good practice, but this still introduces some ranking artefacts, at least in my experience with Phind. What I would like to see mos

No doubt double checking is good practice, but this still introduces some ranking artefacts, at least in my experience with Phind. What I would like to see most is the actual word/phrase/source distributions for a given prompt, in order to judge the sparsity of the underlying training data and subsequently, 'crowd source' the remaining gaps.