3 ms·
It made me wonder too, what the (practical) advantage over contracts is. If anything, Liquid Types seem less powerful. E.g., you can't use it to express a relat
by tgv 3y ago
It made me wonder too, what the (practical) advantage over contracts is. If anything, Liquid Types seem less powerful. E.g., you can't use it to express a relation between two function parameters. It seems to be a macro for contracts (the type name implicitly copies its restriction as a contract clause), so in that sense it could be welcome as a practical way of improving correctness.