4 ms·
I have heard before about BPAs being bad, but it made me kinda chuckle that increasing the risk of diabetes was mentioned, while this story is about Coke. Thank
by sverhagen 3y ago
I have heard before about BPAs being bad, but it made me kinda chuckle that increasing the risk of diabetes was mentioned, while this story is about Coke. Thank goodness, the liner won't give you diabetes no more.
- londons_explore 3y agoThe fact that coke was sufficiently worried about a 2um thick layer on the inside of their cans that they decided to do what appears to be an emergency formula change tells me that management probably has data showing BPA to be really bad (and therefore a risk to their business if everyone with infertility, obesity, heart disease, type 2 diabetes, and cancer sues them)
- seszett 3y ago> coke was sufficiently worried about a 2um thick layer Whether they were worried themselves or not is not what made them change, French law (then followed by the rest of the EU, California and China) was the reason.
- dylan604 3y agoOnce you have to put the dreaded "Known to the state of California" label, it's all down hill
- deleted 3y ago[deleted]