3 ms·
I played a lot of tournament bridge from childhood through college and then stopped (I’m now 32). For me, the two big reasons I quit were (1) the rating system
by pruetj 3y ago
I played a lot of tournament bridge from childhood through college and then stopped (I’m now 32).
For me, the two big reasons I quit were (1) the rating system, and (2) finding a partner.
For the rating system, it’s just not competitive. Master points don’t necessarily mean anything. If you have a lot, it means you’ve played a lot - maybe they at least mean that. You could play for 50 years and easily become a life master but be complete garbage compared to the kid who did it in a month or two. There’s no information to understand how successful you actually are minus what you alone know about yourself and your game. It’s just not as fun, especially once I started to play games that make success extremely evident via stats / ranking.
Bridge is very unique in needing a partner to play with and one that you understand quite well. I once played with one of the best players in the world as a 16 year old (literally, one of the “best” at least master point wise). We did terrible lol. I didn’t know what he was doing and he couldn’t stoop down to my level all too well. How do you find the right partner? Not really sure. Again, I think it’s actually a cool part of the game, adds a unique social element and togetherness to it but it does make getting plugged into it harder.
- pmyteh 3y agoThe English Bridge Union has introduced a National Grading Scheme as a supplement/replacement for master points, for exactly the reasons you suggest. It's got its idiosyncrasies, but it's a lot better than the old "number goes up". https://www.ebu.co.uk/gradings-rankings/national-grading-scheme-ngs https://www.ebu.co.uk/gradings-rankings/national-grading-sch...