It's a mentally lazy jump to conclusion to proclaim them "lovers" without conclusive evidence. They could've been parent-son, any number of relations, or even s

It's a mentally lazy jump to conclusion to proclaim them "lovers" without conclusive evidence. They could've been parent-son, any number of relations, or even strangers. FWIW, for skeletons in better condition, there is another sex-linked feature other than pelvis shape: the back of the skull. There is a significant pyramidal structure on the back of the skull of all biological males and none in biological females. Forensic anthropologists and MDs who paid attention in class should know this. It's likely the skeletons are in fair to poor condition after 2800 years, so not every feature would be in pristine shape.