Okay, so the final report is correct then thanks to him, but the conclusions aren't? I dismissed him out of hand, I'll admit. I'm just really unsure why the i

Okay, so the final report is correct then thanks to him, but the conclusions aren't? I dismissed him out of hand, I'll admit. I'm just really unsure why the idea that heat reduces the strength of steel enough, and that the failure of the columns located in the hottest area of the fire then caused a cascading failure across other columns, is considered less likely than massive conspiracy. It's the usual swiss cheese model of disaster.