3 ms·

The biggest issue is the need to avoid spamming people with duplicate posts. They handle it decently, but it's a sharp tool. They recommend using this tool befo

The biggest issue is the need to avoid spamming people with duplicate posts. They handle it decently, but it's a sharp tool. They recommend using this tool before migrating any followers, so they won't see the same posts again. They also do other things to avoid spam: repost everything as unlisted by default, so it doesn't spam the public and local feeds, and rename hashtags and @ mentions to not spam them either. It also can't set the date correctly. All in all, maybe it would be better to archive your old posts somewhere other than your new Mastodon account and instead put a link to it in your profile? Do archive sites exist? Maybe someone could create a tool for that.

tedunangst 3y ago
Or just let people import the export archive.
- skybrian 3y ago
  I think I'd rather put archived posts somewhere more permanent than whatever Mastodon server I picked. The new server might not be better than the old one, so then I'd need to move the archived posts again.
  - distract8901 3y ago
    To what end? You'd have to host them externally to your mastodon account, which means you'd have to link out to any old post you wanted to share. People scrolling through your mastodon profile wouldn't see anything you didn't explicitly repost. Most won't click through to your archive website, almost no one would ever see your archive. If you just want to archive them for your own purposes, you already have the archive download. The point of this is fixing the biggest problem of account migration: loss of account history.
    - skybrian 3y ago
      I don't know, why publish anything? It's likely that nobody will see your old posts anyway because they won't scroll past the first page of your profile, and you'll soon be adding more posts on top of them, so they'll just get further buried. You'll need a pinned post for anything you want people to read. Clicking on a link is easier than scrolling a long way into a feed. This is largely a matter of motivation: have you explained why they should care enough to click? A link that just says "archive" probably wouldn't be motivating. Meanwhile, if you move the posts, all links break, and those might be links from places that are more motivating. It might be unavoidable the first time, but it would be nice if it didn't happen repeatedly. I expect a Github repo will still be there after today's Mastodon servers disappear, for example, so it might be a good way to archive? All of this is assuming that you have archives that are interesting and valuable history and you want them to be public, so your archives are worth linking to. It's much like archiving old public mailing lists. Maybe similar archiving tools could handle both? But if the posts aren't valuable or you don't want random strangers to be able to read them, it might be better to just let them go, or not put them online at all.

tedunangst 3y ago

Or just let people import the export archive.

skybrian 3y ago
I think I'd rather put archived posts somewhere more permanent than whatever Mastodon server I picked. The new server might not be better than the old one, so then I'd need to move the archived posts again.
- distract8901 3y ago
  To what end? You'd have to host them externally to your mastodon account, which means you'd have to link out to any old post you wanted to share. People scrolling through your mastodon profile wouldn't see anything you didn't explicitly repost. Most won't click through to your archive website, almost no one would ever see your archive. If you just want to archive them for your own purposes, you already have the archive download. The point of this is fixing the biggest problem of account migration: loss of account history.
  - skybrian 3y ago
    I don't know, why publish anything? It's likely that nobody will see your old posts anyway because they won't scroll past the first page of your profile, and you'll soon be adding more posts on top of them, so they'll just get further buried. You'll need a pinned post for anything you want people to read. Clicking on a link is easier than scrolling a long way into a feed. This is largely a matter of motivation: have you explained why they should care enough to click? A link that just says "archive" probably wouldn't be motivating. Meanwhile, if you move the posts, all links break, and those might be links from places that are more motivating. It might be unavoidable the first time, but it would be nice if it didn't happen repeatedly. I expect a Github repo will still be there after today's Mastodon servers disappear, for example, so it might be a good way to archive? All of this is assuming that you have archives that are interesting and valuable history and you want them to be public, so your archives are worth linking to. It's much like archiving old public mailing lists. Maybe similar archiving tools could handle both? But if the posts aren't valuable or you don't want random strangers to be able to read them, it might be better to just let them go, or not put them online at all.