3 ms·
Sure, their offering (in terms of features) is similar to most other shared hosting services. But what I like is that they've consistently been no-nonsense, su
by iamcalledrob 3y ago
Sure, their offering (in terms of features) is similar to most other shared hosting services.
But what I like is that they've consistently been no-nonsense, super fairly priced, and aren't condescending to technically competent people.
Sure, I could do this myself, but sometimes you just want to get a website online and have someone else worry about hosting it.
- tomxor 3y ago> Sure, I could do this myself, but sometimes you just want to get a website online and have someone else worry about hosting it. Exactly, I run numerous systems at the VPS level, the OS, the libraries, the databases, the applications, the replication, the automation of all that, as part of my day job... but that's big production stuff with big production requirements. If I want to throw up a small static site (or even simple non static site), and forget about it, NFS is the place to go. That the UI is exactly the same each time I login, even with years in between, is a huge feature, especially in the mess of UI/UX churn madness that is the rest of the web. NFS is the only shared host that is fair and trustworthy, and that is part aligned incentives, part being run by awesome human beings.