3 ms·
I think that "helplessly in thrall to one of the archetypal narrative forms: Good vs Evil" sums up everyone commenting on this page who claims that their versio
by rectang 3y ago
I think that "helplessly in thrall to one of the archetypal narrative forms: Good vs Evil" sums up everyone commenting on this page who claims that their version of history is objective, while that of [insert opponent here] is not.
- goatlover 3y agoNo, they're saying the claims made about Henry Cort in a paper lack historical evidence in favor of telling an ideological story, which shouldn't have passed peer review. A couple of historians have already done the fact checking. Edit: Oh I misread your post. You're referring to commenters critiquing ideological opponents, not the author.