4 ms·
I gotta be honest, I find it almost a little disrespectful that everyone started naming their shit „x is all you need“ even for very mundane stuff. Attention i
by Version467 3y ago
I gotta be honest, I find it almost a little disrespectful that everyone started naming their shit „x is all you need“ even for very mundane stuff.
Attention is all you need was a breakthrough paper. It fundamentally changed the ML landscape and got us out of a huge roadblock with rnns.
If you seriously think you have something similarly impactful on your hands, then sure go ahead with that name.
But there’s been a bunch of papers where I found it distasteful. At best its just not funny. But this isn’t even really much of a paper. I’ve seen blog posts with more substance. Hell, even YouTube videos.
I don’t know, I guess I just don’t really get the joke.
- blazespin 3y ago"Attention is all you need" was a silly name and most people who name their stuff are poking fun at it. Obviously, attention is not all you need. Just like lucene isn't all you need.
- flangola7 3y agoI'm so tired of complaints like this comment. Just read the paper and ignore the name FFS.
- PheonixPharts 3y agoYou should write a paper: "all you need considered harmful" I don't think referencing well known papers has ever (well maybe not, ever) implied that the authors feel their work is on par with original. It's a pretty common practice in some academic circles when there is an impactful paper with a catchy name and you simply want to pay a bit homage and have a less boring title than you might have otherwise.