3 ms·

I think you are missing an incredible amount of context. The main takeaways I got from GP's post are: - psychedelics can be and usually are an incredible life-

by kortex 3y ago

I think you are missing an incredible amount of context. The main takeaways I got from GP's post are: - psychedelics can be and usually are an incredible life-changing experience for the better - psychedelic-naive users should start with the lowest-duration drugs until they know how their body and brain react to them - it's also a really good idea to have an "abort button" on hand (xanax/olams. Personally I'd recommend lorazepam, it's much safer and milder) if things start to go really south I understand the concern about polypharmacy, but Benzos and psychedelics don't really have adverse interactions. The whole point is that benzos can put the kabash on the anxiety component of a "bad trip" (they won't stop the trip but they will mitigate the potential for psychological injury). On the other hand, GP is saying things elsewhere in thread that feel... insufficiently substantiated, to be generous.

Jerrrry 3y ago
>On the other hand, GP is saying things elsewhere in thread that feel... insufficiently substantiated, to be generous. >insufficiently substantiated we are literally talking about effects that cannot, by definition, be articulated or substantiated usefully, and havent, because of their legalities. if you are looking for a single sentence to sum it up, I don't think I have done an injustice. LSD and Mushrooms are NOT as "safe" as culturally represented. I don't recommended anyone who is not in the soundest of minds to try DMT, without an experienced trip-sitter, and an abort -zolam. That is the sentiment I've expressed, to a bizarre amount of mis-inference for dubious moral grandstanding by those I am sure think that they, too, know everything.