4 ms·
if you have video of somebody being put on a stretcher before they died, it's best not to share that too widely. for legal reasons as well as just general huma
by notatoad 3y ago
if you have video of somebody being put on a stretcher before they died, it's best not to share that too widely. for legal reasons as well as just general humanity.
- bink 3y agoThey don't need to publish it on a website. They could release it to the local news orgs that handle this type of video daily. It's not hard to blur things that would be offensive.
- minwcnt5 3y agoIsn't that exactly what they've done? Forbes, NBC, KRON4, SFStandard, and probably other news orgs have all reviewed the video.
- bink 3y agoI'm not sure how many orgs have seen it. I've heard of two and we don't have any way of knowing if they saw an edited or full copy and from all available angles. They apparently haven't been allowed to make a copy of it and broadcast it so we can make up our own minds.
- sdflhasjd 3y agoFrom the article, it implies the patient wasn't recorded on video. > The video, which Cruise declined to share publicly [...] does not capture the patient being loaded onto the ambulance.