5 ms·
Maybe the AIs will take the studio's jobs before they take the artist's jobs (enabling much higher pay for creatives). After all the script is just 5% of the co
by zug_zug 3y ago
Maybe the AIs will take the studio's jobs before they take the artist's jobs (enabling much higher pay for creatives). After all the script is just 5% of the cost [1]. I'm sure there are pieces of the multi-hundred-million dollar movie-production process that are easier to automate that script writing and acting.
[1] https://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0611/why-movies-cost-so-much-to-make.aspx https://www.investopedia.com/financial-edge/0611/why-movies-...
- phpisthebest 3y ago>>I'm sure there are pieces of the multi-hundred-million dollar movie-production process that are easier to automate that script writing and acting. You assume that is not already happening? How many physical effects people where displaced or had to find different things to do when CGI automated large amounts of physical effects? How much bigger would be budgets need to be to do physical effects instead of CGI? I am sure their are tons of other examples of automation and technology that allows a movie to be made with far less people. That is the natural progress of things.