5 ms·

I have the JetBrains Toolbox with the “All Products Pack” and it works like a charm! The JetBrains products are far superior to other products I’ve tried. I mos

I have the JetBrains Toolbox with the “All Products Pack” and it works like a charm! The JetBrains products are far superior to other products I’ve tried. I mostly used Pycharm, Datagrip, CLion, and Goland and love them. Couldn’t imagine dev without them

glintik 3y ago
[flagged]
- jcpst 3y ago
  Huh- I use datagrip because I prefer the UI over say, dbeaver
- victorgama 3y ago
  I only used CLion with CMake... But I'm curious now; would you mind to expand on that lack of support? Also: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/clion/quick-cmake-tutorial.html https://www.jetbrains.com/help/clion/quick-cmake-tutorial.ht...
- trollied 3y ago
  In what way does clion not support cmake? I started a new project yesterday, added a new C++ class & it automatically added it to the CMakelists.
- dagw 3y ago
  Clion still doesn’t support cmake Cmake is the default build system used by Clion out of the box.
- Jenk 3y ago
  Datagrip is market-leading for UI/X of DB tooling AFAIAC. Would you mind giving an example of a tool you regard as having a better UI?
glintik 3y ago
Clion doesn’t have Scons support still: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/CPP-1102 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/CPP-1102 9 years!
- Karunamon 3y ago
  This is my primary gripe with what is otherwise a solid company with solid products: glacial pace of improvements and bug fixes. They are spending tons of developer time on a GUI rework nobody asked for while actual usability warts like: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RUBY-9302 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RUBY-9302 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-226503/It-is-not-clear-why-Force-push-is-disabled-in-the-push-dialog https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-226503/It-is-not-c... …languish for years. Just about every Python project I have worked on has a number of bogus warnings (that is, the code that triggers the warning is correct and the warning objectively does not apply), and my last experience trying to report a problem with their inspections system put me off ever wasting the time to do it again. https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RUBY-15612 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RUBY-15612
qsort 3y ago
I switched to Pycharm Professional a couple of years ago (VS Code before, vim before that) and I can echo this sentiment, it's very good and well worth my money. An unexpected, charm, if you will, was that it can also replace DBeaver for me. I work a lot with data and a good database interface is worth its weight in gold, that's a major plus for the Jetbrains suite as far as I'm concerned. A few downsides are the memory usage, the fact that the default editor isn't very ergonomic (easily solved for me thanks to the Vim plugin, but default vs. default VS Code is much better IMO), and the lack of remote capabilities (edit files on a remote machine with your local instance, VS Code is still much better). Many have criticized the "new UI" but to be honest I don't care much either way, it's just cosmetics.

glintik 3y ago

[flagged]

jcpst 3y ago
Huh- I use datagrip because I prefer the UI over say, dbeaver
victorgama 3y ago
I only used CLion with CMake... But I'm curious now; would you mind to expand on that lack of support? Also: https://www.jetbrains.com/help/clion/quick-cmake-tutorial.html https://www.jetbrains.com/help/clion/quick-cmake-tutorial.ht...
trollied 3y ago
In what way does clion not support cmake? I started a new project yesterday, added a new C++ class & it automatically added it to the CMakelists.
dagw 3y ago
Clion still doesn’t support cmake Cmake is the default build system used by Clion out of the box.
Jenk 3y ago
Datagrip is market-leading for UI/X of DB tooling AFAIAC. Would you mind giving an example of a tool you regard as having a better UI?

glintik 3y ago

Clion doesn’t have Scons support still: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/CPP-1102 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/CPP-1102 9 years!

Karunamon 3y ago
This is my primary gripe with what is otherwise a solid company with solid products: glacial pace of improvements and bug fixes. They are spending tons of developer time on a GUI rework nobody asked for while actual usability warts like: https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RUBY-9302 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RUBY-9302 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-226503/It-is-not-clear-why-Force-push-is-disabled-in-the-push-dialog https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/IDEA-226503/It-is-not-c... …languish for years. Just about every Python project I have worked on has a number of bogus warnings (that is, the code that triggers the warning is correct and the warning objectively does not apply), and my last experience trying to report a problem with their inspections system put me off ever wasting the time to do it again. https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RUBY-15612 https://youtrack.jetbrains.com/issue/RUBY-15612

qsort 3y ago

I switched to Pycharm Professional a couple of years ago (VS Code before, vim before that) and I can echo this sentiment, it's very good and well worth my money. An unexpected, charm, if you will, was that it can also replace DBeaver for me. I work a lot with data and a good database interface is worth its weight in gold, that's a major plus for the Jetbrains suite as far as I'm concerned. A few downsides are the memory usage, the fact that the default editor isn't very ergonomic (easily solved for me thanks to the Vim plugin, but default vs. default VS Code is much better IMO), and the lack of remote capabilities (edit files on a remote machine with your local instance, VS Code is still much better). Many have criticized the "new UI" but to be honest I don't care much either way, it's just cosmetics.