i found it's exactly the oposite. i think i STARTED right, and then became hogwash of someone that does not understand hacker. basically i read it as: "hackers

i found it's exactly the oposite. i think i STARTED right, and then became hogwash of someone that does not understand hacker. basically i read it as: "hackers laugh at the pace of big corporations, but big corporations will prevail now that we need (gasp) 400k programs" seems like the journalist started right, and then just wrote whatever the PR guy at IBM told him to write.